Skip to content
                          REALaw

REALaw

European and comparative administrative law

Search
  • Twitter
  • WordPress
  • Home
    • Our editors
      • Welcome to the REALaw blog!
    • Our editorial board
    • Advisory Board
    • Submission and inquiries
  • Blog
  • Journal
    • Editorials
    • Issues 2021-2022
    • Open Access Issues 2020-
    • Open Access Issues 2014-2019
    • Open Access Issues 2008-2013
  • Focus
    • Focus – CILFIT revisited
    • Focus – Cooperation in taxation
    • FOCUS – Banco Popular(2022)
    • Book Focus – EU Environmental Principles and Scientific Uncertainty before National Courts – The Case of the Habitats Directive

Category: Transparency

Composite procedure…

Good administration for whom, by whom? The right to be heard and the right of access to files in resolution matters, by J Reichel

14 Oct 202213 Oct 2022
In all five cases on the Banco Popular resolution (T-481/17, T-510/17, T-523/17, T-570/17, and T-628/17), the applicants argued that their right to some aspect of good administration in Article 41 of the…
Equality…

Why we need a doctrine of scarce government rights, by S Verbeyst, S Devroe and S Lierman

11 Oct 20229 Oct 2022
Summary Central to the doctrine of scarce government rights is the search for a transparent distribution system. Scarce rights are rights that are limited in number and where demand exceeds…
Accountability…

Nemo censetur ignorare legem: the dilemma regarding the access to ISO standards referenced into EU law, by Marie Gérardy

23 Nov 202123 Nov 2021
EU public actors increasingly use copyright-protected private technical standards in the operationalisation of EU law. This post suggests that the responsibility to work out the tension between the right to…
Accountability…

Assessing Assessors – How to Evaluate the Scientific Performance of a Pesticide Regulatory Authority, by Sari Autio

22 Oct 202112 Oct 2021
A scientific performance evaluation is a valuable means for organizational learning and for strengthening the accountability of regulatory authorities. At the request of the Dutch Competent Authority for authorisation of…
Administrative oversight…

Overseeing Trilogues: What Is the Impact of Administrative and Judicial Watchdogs?, by Maarten Hillebrandt

19 Oct 202112 Oct 2021
An analysis of the interventions of the European Ombudsman and of the Court of Justice of the EU in the area of trilogue (in)transparency suggests that institutional structures and dependencies…

Submission

You are welcome to submit your pieces either to the journal [click here] or to the blog [click here].

Top Posts

  • The General Court annuls an ECB decision for misapplying national law: Case T-502/19 Francesca Corneli v ECB, by M Markakis
  • Services of General Interest (EU) as Indicators of Public Functions in the Sense of Public Administrative Law - Using EU Concepts to Deal with Problems of National Law, by Margrét Vala Kristjánsdóttir
  • Effective legal protection in the SSM’s composite administrative procedures, by Laura Wissink
  • Composite procedures and judicial protection: in Fininvest and Silvio Berlusconi v. European Central Bank (T-913/16) the General Court delivers a “Pilate’s judgment”, by Andrea Magliari
  • EU Agencies before the Court of Justice, 2nd & 3rd June

Latest Posts

  • Services of General Interest (EU) as Indicators of Public Functions in the Sense of Public Administrative Law – Using EU Concepts to Deal with Problems of National Law, by Margrét Vala Kristjánsdóttir
  • Article 47 of the Charter, Effective Judicial Protection and the (Procedural) Autonomy of the Member States, by Matteo Bonelli
  • EU Environmental Principles and Scientific Uncertainty before National Courts—The Case of the Habitats Directive: Some Comparative Conclusions, by M Eliantonio, E Lees and T Paloniitty
  • Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in EU Competition Enforcement: A Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment, by Andriani Kalintiri
  • Handling environmental cases in administrative courts: Lithuania, by J. Paužaitė-Kulvinskienė and I. Žvaigždinienė

Categories

Tags

#Aarhus_Convention #AFSJ #Australia #Belgium #Book_Launch #call_for_papers #civil_service #Denmark #ECHR_art_10 #England #EU #EU_funds #France #GDPR #Germany #Habitats_Directive #Hungary #Ireland #Italy #Lithuania #Netherlands #Online_discussions #Portugal #Romania #Shengen #Single_Supervisory_Mechanism #Spain #Sweden #UK Article 47 Effective judicial protection Iceland newsetter procedural autonomy Publicness Services of General Interest
Follow REALaw on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,847 other subscribers

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets
  • Twitter
  • WordPress
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • REALaw
    • Join 98 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • REALaw
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy