Access to justice… How Do French Courts Deal with Article 47 of the EU Charter ? There is Still Room for Progress, by Marion Ho-Dac & Lamprini Xenou 2 Jun 202331 May 2023 Considering the EU Charter in the French Jurisdiction Any comparative research on the impact of Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the European Union (EU) legal…
Comparative Administrative Law… Hitting not only the Target: The Indirect Review of Administrative Action in Serbia and Croatia, by Vuk Cucić 28 Mar 202310 Apr 2023 Introduction The issue of the indirect review of administrative action in Serbia and Croatia boils down to the matter of the control of constitutionality and legality of general legal acts,…
Comparative Administrative Law… Hierarchy of Norms, Iura Novit Curia, and No Need to Plea for Indirect Review of Administrative Action – The Strictly German Legal Point of View by Ulrich Stelkens 21 Mar 2023 When I was first asked to contribute to the book edited by Mariolina Eliantonio (forthcoming in Routledge 2022) Indirect Judicial Review in Administrative Law. Legality vs Legal Certainty in Europe,…
Effective judicial protection… Indirect review of administrative action in Sweden, by Torvald Larsson 14 Feb 20239 Feb 2023 Introduction My chapter in the book Indirect Judicial Review in Administrative Law, Legality vs Legal Certainty in Europe is dedicated to the role and function of indirect review of administrative…
Effective judicial protection Concluding thoughts on Article 47 of the Charter and effective judicial protection – Volume I, by G Gentile, M Bonelli and M Eliantonio 8 Feb 20238 Feb 2023 Our volume “Article 47 of the EU Charter and the Principle of Effective Judicial Protection – Volume 1: the Court of Justice’s Perspective” has explored the impact of Article 47…
Access to justice… ‘A spectre is haunting Kirchberg’ – the Spectre of Article 47: the CJEU Case Law on the Finality of Judicial Decisions and on the Ex Officio Application of EU law, by Mariolina Eliantonio 31 Jan 20231 Feb 2023 Introduction The rules on the finality of judicial decisions serve to strike a balance between two competing imperatives: that of legality, which would hold unlawful decisions to be ideally revocable…
Access to justice… Article 47 of the Charter, Effective Judicial Protection and the (Procedural) Autonomy of the Member States, by Matteo Bonelli 24 Jan 202319 Jan 2023 My contribution to the volume on Article 47 of the EU Charter and Effective Judicial Protection – Volume 1: The Court of Justice’s Perspective, which I have co-edited with Mariolina…
Competition… Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in EU Competition Enforcement: A Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment, by Andriani Kalintiri 17 Jan 202316 Jan 2023 Introduction The competition rules have played a vital role in the establishment of the European Union by prohibiting collusive arrangements, abuses of a dominant position, state aid that distorts competition,…
Effective judicial protection Searching the Pieces of the EU Justice Puzzle: Articles 47, 48, 49 and 50 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, by S Menzione and G Gentile 10 Jan 20239 Jan 2023 The Chapter “Searching the Pieces of the EU Justice Puzzle: Articles 47, 48, 49, and 50 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights” authored by Giulia Gentile and Serena Menzione…
Effective judicial protection No turning back? The empowerment of national asylum and migration courts under Article 47 of the Charter, by M Reneman 13 Dec 202212 Dec 2022 This blog is based on my chapter with the same title which will be published in: M. Bonelli, M. Eliantonio, and G. Gentile, Article 47 of the EU Charter and…
