Skip to content

European and comparative administrative law

Search
  • Twitter
  • WordPress
  • Home
    • Our editors
      • Welcome to the REALaw blog!
    • Our editorial board
    • Advisory Board
    • Submission and inquiries
  • Blog
  • Journal
    • Editorials
    • Issues 2021-2022
    • Open Access Issues 2020-
    • Open Access Issues 2014-2019
    • Open Access Issues 2008-2013
  • ⚖️Case Focus
    • Focus – CILFIT revisited
    • Focus – Cooperation in taxation
    • FOCUS – Banco Popular(2022)
  • 📚 Book Highlights
    • Book Focus – EU Environmental Principles and Scientific Uncertainty before National Courts – The Case of the Habitats Directive
    • 📚Book Highlights-Art 47 EUCh and effective judicial protection
    • 📚Book Highlights – Indirect Judicial Review in Administrative Law – Legality vs Legal Certainty in Europe
  • 💡TOPICAL ISSUE- Climate change & scholactivism
  • 🔀 European administrative law dialogues

Tag: #Single_Supervisory_Mechanism

Accountability…

Judicial Review of EU-level Resolution of a Systemically Significant Eurozone Bank by an EU Agency in the SRM – Concluding remarks to the blog series on the Banco Popular case, by JTimmermans

11 Nov 202214 Nov 2022
Introduction The Banking Union, incl. the SRM framework, has been highly criticised by economists, politicians and legal experts for being considered flawed, incomplete and institutionally complex. This criticism is expected…
National/European law

The General Court annuls an ECB decision for misapplying national law: Case T-502/19 Francesca Corneli v ECB, by M Markakis

8 Nov 20226 Nov 2022
On 12 October 2022, the General Court delivered its judgment in Case T-502/19 Francesca Corneli v European Central Bank. The case is particularly important for the European Banking Union, as…
Composite procedure

The impact of the Banco Popular judgments on the institutional framework of the SRM and the SRB, by M Markakis

4 Nov 202221 Oct 2022
Notwithstanding its young age, the Banking Union has already given rise to a very large number of cases.[i] One need not peruse further than the latest posts featured on leading…
Composite procedure

The non-delegation doctrine in the Banco Popular cases, by Merijn Chamon

28 Oct 20222 Nov 2022
Introduction The present blogpost will zoom in on how the Banco Popular judgments of the General Court (GC) have clarified the non-delegation doctrine commonly referred to as the Meroni doctrine.…
Composite procedure

Taking Financial Risks Out of Property Rights Protection under Article 17 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights by Sabrina Praduroux

21 Oct 202221 Oct 2022
Judgments of the General Court in the Case T-510/17, Antonio Del Valle Ruíz and Others v European Commission and Single Resolution Board. The case stemmed from an action based on…
Composite procedure…

Good administration for whom, by whom? The right to be heard and the right of access to files in resolution matters, by J Reichel

14 Oct 202213 Oct 2022
In all five cases on the Banco Popular resolution (T-481/17, T-510/17, T-523/17, T-570/17, and T-628/17), the applicants argued that their right to some aspect of good administration in Article 41 of the…
Accountability…

Referential reasons-giving and the limits of Union Agencies’ power, by F Brito Bastos

7 Oct 20222 Oct 2022
Introduction On June 1st, 2022, the General Court delivered five much-anticipated rulings on the Banco Popular case. The rulings are gargantuan in length and raise numerous issues from the perspective…
Composite procedure

Liability for the Resolution of Banks, by Phedon Nicolaides

30 Sep 20222 Nov 2022
Introduction The case law on the EU’s banking union is expanding rapidly. But like in any other nascent area of law, there are unsettled issues. Liability for the resolution of…
Composite procedure

Composite procedures and judicial protection: in Fininvest and Silvio Berlusconi v. European Central Bank (T-913/16) the General Court delivers a “Pilate’s judgment”, by Andrea Magliari

27 Sep 202225 Sep 2022
The decision rendered by the General Court on 11 May 2022 in case T-913/16[1] marks an important (and yet not final) step in the Fininvest and Berlusconi judicial saga. Essentially,…
Agencies…

The possibility of judicial review of the SRB’s resolution decision in Case T-481/17 Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v SRB, by R Lanceiro

23 Sep 202222 Sep 2022
On 1st June 2022, the General Court rendered its judgments in the five pilot cases on the Banco Popular resolution. These were much awaited because it was the first time…

Posts navigation

Older posts

Submission

You are welcome to submit your pieces either to the journal [click here] or to the blog [click here].

📢 Call for papers on Sixty Years of Van Gend en Loos – more information here

Top Posts

  • How Do French Courts Deal with Article 47 of the EU Charter ? There is Still Room for Progress, by Marion Ho-Dac & Lamprini Xenou 
  • The plea of illegality in European Union law - The missing piece in the puzzle of a ‘complete system of remedies’?, by Mariolina Eliantonio
  • Promoting mediation to resolve administrative disputes in Council of Europe member states (part I), by Karim Salem and Margaret Doyle
  • The General Court annuls an ECB decision for misapplying national law: Case T-502/19 Francesca Corneli v ECB, by M Markakis
  • Overseeing Trilogues: What Is the Impact of Administrative and Judicial Watchdogs?, by Maarten Hillebrandt

Latest Posts

  • How Do French Courts Deal with Article 47 of the EU Charter ? There is Still Room for Progress, by Marion Ho-Dac & Lamprini Xenou 
  • Fine-Print Babel, by F Brito Bastos
  • The role of comparative administrative law in shaping European administrative law – Practitioner’s perspective by Tanja Ehnert
  • Georgiou v. Greece: The right to fair trial and the EU preliminary reference procedure-Harmony or tension?, by Philippos Georgios Kotsalis and Vasileios Kapetanos
  • The UK Freeports Policy, by P Holmes and G Larbalestier

Categories

Tags

#AFSJ #Belgium #Book_Highlights #Case_Focus #England #EU #France #Germany #Netherlands #Online_discussions #Romania #Single_Supervisory_Mechanism #UK Article 47 Climate change Effective judicial protection France Indirect Review Legal Certainty Legality
Follow on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,864 other subscribers

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets
  • Twitter
  • WordPress
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • Join 115 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
 

Loading Comments...