Composite procedures – Page 2

Composite procedures

Here are the posts we found under this category and other related categories.

Taking Financial Risks Out of Property Rights Protection under Article 17 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights by Sabrina Praduroux

21 Oct 2022

Judgments of the General Court in the Case T-510/17, Antonio Del Valle Ruíz and Others v European Commission and Single Resolution Board. The case stemmed from an action based on Article 263 TFEU for annulment…
Read more
Good administration for whom, by whom? The right to be heard and the right of access to files in resolution matters, by J Reichel

14 Oct 2022

In all five cases on the Banco Popular resolution (T-481/17, T-510/17, T-523/17, T-570/17, and T-628/17), the applicants argued that their right to some aspect of good administration in Article 41 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights…
Read more
Referential reasons-giving and the limits of Union Agencies’ power, by F Brito Bastos

7 Oct 2022

Introduction On June 1st, 2022, the General Court delivered five much-anticipated rulings on the Banco Popular case. The rulings are gargantuan in length and raise numerous issues from the perspective not only of the Single…
Read more
Liability for the Resolution of Banks, by Phedon Nicolaides

30 Sep 2022

Introduction The case law on the EU’s banking union is expanding rapidly. But like in any other nascent area of law, there are unsettled issues. Liability for the resolution of banks is one of them.…
Read more
Composite procedures and judicial protection: in Fininvest and Silvio Berlusconi v. European Central Bank (T-913/16) the General Court delivers a “Pilate’s judgment”, by Andrea Magliari

27 Sep 2022

The decision rendered by the General Court on 11 May 2022 in case T-913/16[1] marks an important (and yet not final) step in the Fininvest and Berlusconi judicial saga. Essentially, the facts are quite well…
Read more

Experts’ Corner

EU Agencies Corner edited by Ellen Vos

Taking Financial Risks Out of Property Rights Protection under Article 17 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights by Sabrina Praduroux

Good administration for whom, by whom? The right to be heard and the right of access to files in resolution matters, by J Reichel

Referential reasons-giving and the limits of Union Agencies’ power, by F Brito Bastos

Liability for the Resolution of Banks, by Phedon Nicolaides

Composite procedures and judicial protection: in Fininvest and Silvio Berlusconi v. European Central Bank (T-913/16) the General Court delivers a “Pilate’s judgment”, by Andrea Magliari

Recent posts

AMLA and the Common Approach – Rethinking EU Agencification, by Merijn Chamon

Combatting the adverse consequences of divergent national administrative and judicial decisions in EU law: A perspective from the field of Value Added Tax, by Mathijs Klemm

When the floods rise, the law stands still: the EU’s responsibility to protect climate-displaced people, by Adeodata Kanyamihanda

From Consensus to Exceptionality – What the EU’s AI Standards Crisis Reveals About Delegated Technical Governance, by Marta Cantero Gamito

Let’s Make Good Troubles: Former EFSA Executive Director Bernhard Url Reflects on Past Terms and Challenges for the Future

Limits and Extents of the Administrative Procedure in the Spending Conditionality, by Marco Bevilacqua

Operationalising the ‘Do No Significant Harm’ Principle under the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility: A Multilevel Test for Environmental Governance, by Leila Kentache

The “shaping power” of public finance rules in the European Union, by Elisa D’Alterio

Transparency at the Point of Collection – The CJEU on Relational Pseudonymisation and Personal Data in EDPS v. SRB, by Anubhuti Raje

Unmasking Bid Rigging: A New Look at EU Public Procurement, by Dr. Penelope Giosa

Experts’ Corner

Browse our post categories