Skip to content
                          REALaw

REALaw

European and comparative administrative law

Search
  • Twitter
  • WordPress
  • Home
    • Our editors
      • Welcome to the REALaw blog!
    • Our editorial board
    • Advisory Board
    • Submission and inquiries
  • Blog
  • Journal
    • Editorials
    • Issues 2021-2022
    • Open Access Issues 2020-
    • Open Access Issues 2014-2019
    • Open Access Issues 2008-2013
  • Focus
    • Focus – CILFIT revisited
    • Focus – Cooperation in taxation
    • FOCUS – Banco Popular(2022)
    • Book Focus – EU Environmental Principles and Scientific Uncertainty before National Courts – The Case of the Habitats Directive

Author: ymarique

Environment…

EU Environmental Principles and Scientific Uncertainty before National Courts—The Case of the Habitats Directive: Some Comparative Conclusions, by M Eliantonio, E Lees and T Paloniitty

20 Jan 202320 Jan 2023
The aim of this blog post is to draw some comparative conclusions from the study we carried out on how national courts deal with scientific uncertainty, specifically in the context…
Environment…

Handling environmental cases in administrative courts: Lithuania, by J. Paužaitė-Kulvinskienė and I. Žvaigždinienė

13 Jan 202312 Jan 2023
In Lithuania, administrative courts cover the legality review of administrative decisions, including in the field of environmental protection. In reviewing the latter decisions, a proper balance between the discretion of…
Effective judicial protection

Searching the Pieces of the EU Justice Puzzle: Articles 47, 48, 49 and 50 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, by S Menzione and G Gentile

10 Jan 20239 Jan 2023
The Chapter “Searching the Pieces of the EU Justice Puzzle: Articles 47, 48, 49, and 50 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights” authored by Giulia Gentile and Serena Menzione…
Directives…

Reviewing Science & Law in Member States’ Courts: Enforcement of the Habitats Directive in Ireland, by Á Ryall

16 Dec 202214 Dec 2022
Habitat loss is one of the main threats to biodiversity. The current picture is bleak. Deteriorating trends continue to dominate in Ireland. The Environmental Protection Agency reports that the current…
Effective judicial protection

No turning back? The empowerment of national asylum and migration courts under Article 47 of the Charter, by M Reneman

13 Dec 202212 Dec 2022
This blog is based on my chapter with the same title which will be published in: M. Bonelli, M. Eliantonio, and G. Gentile, Article 47 of the EU Charter and…
Directives…

The deference of Romanian courts to administration when it comes to scientific expertise, by D Dragos and B Neamtu

9 Dec 20229 Dec 2022
In the book edited by Mariolina Eliantonio, Emma Lees, and Tiina Paloniitty forthcoming at Hart Publishing - EU Environmental Principles and Scientific Uncertainty before National Courts – The Case of…
Effective judicial protection…

Article 47 of the Charter and non-discrimination: Going back to the grass roots, by K Gutman

6 Dec 20226 Dec 2022
Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union is all the rage in EU law scholarship. But not so much when it comes to the field…
Environment…

The Scrutiny of Scientific Evidence by UK Courts in Environmental Decisions: Legality, the Fact Law Distinction, and (sometimes) Self-Limiting Review, by C Caine and R Broadbent

2 Dec 202230 Nov 2022
In the UK, claims regarding the Habitats Directive are dealt with through two main avenues: judicial review/statutory appeal, and the Tribunal system. In judicial review and statutory appeal cases, only…
Effective judicial protection

Article 19 TEU and national courts: A new role for the principle of effective judicial protection?, by S Prechal

29 Nov 202228 Nov 2022
Initially, Article 19 (1), second paragraph, TEU was used as an aid to interpretation. However, it has since become a self-standing ground for the review of national measures affecting the…
Environment…

Biodiversity in the court: the certainty of contests about uncertainty, by Justice Preston

25 Nov 20221 Dec 2022
Disputes about biodiversity loss involve considerable scientific uncertainty. Uncertainty arises because of the unpredictability and randomness of natural systems and processes. In adjudicating biodiversity-related disputes, courts often need to resolve…

Posts navigation

Older posts

Submission

You are welcome to submit your pieces either to the journal [click here] or to the blog [click here].

Top Posts

  • The General Court annuls an ECB decision for misapplying national law: Case T-502/19 Francesca Corneli v ECB, by M Markakis
  • Services of General Interest (EU) as Indicators of Public Functions in the Sense of Public Administrative Law - Using EU Concepts to Deal with Problems of National Law, by Margrét Vala Kristjánsdóttir
  • Effective legal protection in the SSM’s composite administrative procedures, by Laura Wissink
  • Composite procedures and judicial protection: in Fininvest and Silvio Berlusconi v. European Central Bank (T-913/16) the General Court delivers a “Pilate’s judgment”, by Andrea Magliari
  • EU Agencies before the Court of Justice, 2nd & 3rd June

Latest Posts

  • Services of General Interest (EU) as Indicators of Public Functions in the Sense of Public Administrative Law – Using EU Concepts to Deal with Problems of National Law, by Margrét Vala Kristjánsdóttir
  • Article 47 of the Charter, Effective Judicial Protection and the (Procedural) Autonomy of the Member States, by Matteo Bonelli
  • EU Environmental Principles and Scientific Uncertainty before National Courts—The Case of the Habitats Directive: Some Comparative Conclusions, by M Eliantonio, E Lees and T Paloniitty
  • Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in EU Competition Enforcement: A Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment, by Andriani Kalintiri
  • Handling environmental cases in administrative courts: Lithuania, by J. Paužaitė-Kulvinskienė and I. Žvaigždinienė

Categories

Tags

#Aarhus_Convention #AFSJ #Australia #Belgium #Book_Launch #call_for_papers #civil_service #Denmark #ECHR_art_10 #England #EU #EU_funds #France #GDPR #Germany #Habitats_Directive #Hungary #Ireland #Italy #Lithuania #Netherlands #Online_discussions #Portugal #Romania #Shengen #Single_Supervisory_Mechanism #Spain #Sweden #UK Article 47 Effective judicial protection Iceland newsetter procedural autonomy Publicness Services of General Interest
Follow REALaw on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,847 other subscribers

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets
  • Twitter
  • WordPress
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • REALaw
    • Join 98 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • REALaw
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
 

Loading Comments...